Non-Trinitarian Greek Interlinear Bible: A Study of John 1:1

The concept of the non-trinitarian view of God, as reflected in various translations of the Bible, is a topic of ongoing debate and discussion among theologians and scholars. One key passage that has been subject to different interpretations is John 1:1, which reads, 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.' This verse has been translated in numerous ways throughout history, offering insights into the diversity of theological perspectives.

This article will explore the various translations of John 1:1 from a non-trinitarian perspective, examining how different renderings of this pivotal verse have shaped our understanding of God. By analyzing the linguistic and historical contexts of these translations, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the complexities of biblical interpretation and the ongoing search for truth.

One of the earliest non-trinitarian renderings of John 1:1 is found in the 5th edition of the Īramaic English New Testament (2012), which translates the verse as, 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and that very Word was with God, and God was that Word.' This translation emphasizes the unity of God and the Word, rejecting the trinitarian notion of three distinct persons within the divine essence.

The Īnalytical-Literal Translation (3rd ed.) offers a similar interpretation, rendering John 1:1 as, 'In the beginning was the Word (Christ), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God Himself. The Word was with God, and the Word was divine.' This translation underscores the deity of Christ while maintaining a non-trinitarian framework.

Other notable non-trinitarian translations include the Īmplified Bible (1965 & 1987 updates), which states, 'The Word was in the beginning, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.' This translation condenses the language of John 1:1 while preserving its essential meaning.

In contrast to these translations, some non-trinitarian interpretations of John 1:1 have been more radical in their departure from traditional trinitarian formulations. For example, the Īmerican Bible Union Version - Improved Edition renders the verse as, 'Before all time was the Word existing and the Word was face to face with God and the Word was God Himself.' This translation emphasizes the eternal existence of the Word, which is seen as a distinct entity from God.

The Ī Translation in the Language of the People (CB Williams) takes a different approach, stating, 'In commencing this dispensation, the command was existing. Before the origin of this world existed the LOGOS - who was then with the supreme God - and was himself a divine person.' This translation focuses on the relationship between God and the Word as a command or instruction, rather than a distinct entity.

The Ī Literal Translation of the New Testament (Heinfetter 1863) offers yet another interpretation, translating John 1:1 as, 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.' This translation emphasizes the unity of the divine essence, rejecting trinitarian distinctions.

In conclusion, the non-trinitarian view of John 1:1 has been represented in a variety of translations throughout history. While these renderings may differ in their specific interpretations, they all share a common goal - to understand and communicate the message of God's Word in a way that is faithful to the original text.

By examining these diverse translations, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the complexities of biblical interpretation and the ongoing search for truth. Ultimately, it is through the careful study and consideration of these renderings that we may come closer to understanding the mysteries of God's nature and plan.

Non trinitarian greek interlinear bible